d. L. A. No. 17511. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a municipal corporation vs. E. Bennett Adams, et al. and Lawrence Holmes, et al.: Respondents' Supplemental Memorandum. Los Angeles, Calif.: Independent-Review, Law Printers, 1940 (1 piece)

d. L. A. No. 17511. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a municipal corporation vs. E. Bennett Adams, et al. and Lawrence Holmes, et al.: Respondents' Supplemental Memorandum. Los Angeles, Calif.: Independent-Review, Law Printers, 1940 (1 piece) | Collections | The Huntington

Opening Hours

Admission Info and Tickets

You might also be interested in

c. 4th Civil No. 2172: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a municipal corporation vs. E. Bennett Adams, et al. and Lawrence Holmes, et al.: Respondents' Memorandum in Lieu of Oral Argument. Los Angeles, Calif.: Independent-Review, Law Printers, 1939 (1 piece)

b. 4th Civil No. 2172: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a municipal corporation vs. E. Bennett Adams, et al. and Lawrence Holmes, et al.: Respondents' Brief. Los Angeles, Calif.: Independent-Review, Law Printers, 1939 (1 piece)

a. 4th Civil No. 2172: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a municipal corporation vs. E. Bennett Adams, et al. and Lawrence Holmes, et al.: Appendix to Respondents' Brief. Los Angeles, Calif.: Independent-Review, Law Printers, 1939 (1 piece)

a. Archibald Farrington, et al., vs. T. W. Key, et al., 1911-1941 (25 pieces)

2. City of Los Angeles, et al. vs. Nina B. Aitken: Proposed bill of exceptions

2. City of Los Angeles, et al. vs. Nina B. Aitken: Proposed bill of exceptions (continued)