OPEN TODAY: 10 A.M.–5 P.M.

Rare Books

The Vineland Irrigation District, plaintiff, vs. Azusa Irrigating Company et al., defendants : Water rights--appropriation--injunction. Opinion. Hon. Waldo M. York, judge. July 31, 1897

Image not available

Type: Rare Books(Opens in new tab)
Publication date: [1897]
Call number: 480366
Creator: York, Waldo M(Opens in new tab)
Dimensions: 23 cm
Associated organizations: California.; Vineland Irrigation District.; Azusa Irrigating Company.
Find out more: View in the Library catalog(Opens in new tab)

You might also be interested in

Image not available
Ham, plaintiff, vs. Bullard, et. al. defendants : Argument for the plaintiff
Rare Books
249172
Image not available
Lytle Creek Water and Improvement Company plaintiff vs. Grapeland Irrigation district et al., defendants : Opinion of the court
Rare Books
476173
Image not available
Argonaut Mining Company, plaintiff, vs. Kennedy Mining and Milling Company, defendant : Hearing upon plaintiff's motions to remand causes to the Superior Court of Amador County, California. Argument of John M. Wright for defendant, before Hon. W.W. Morrow, Circuit Judge. San Francisco, November 29, 1897, and December 6, 1897
Rare Books
349400
Image not available
E.F. De Celis, plaintiff and respondent, vs. G.K. Porter, defendant and appellant. Vs. C. Maclay, defendant and respondent, motion for a hearing by C. Maclay
Rare Books
232988
Image not available
Carson City Gold and Silver Mining Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, vs. North Star Mining Company ... defendant in error. : Opinion. Filed October 18, 1897
Rare Books
426963
Image not available
Richard F. Knox And Joseph Osborn, Plaintiffs, vs. The Great Western Quicksilver Mining Company, Defendant. Plaintiffs' Points and Authorities on Motion for New Trial. M.A. Wheaton, Counsel for Plaintiffs
Rare Books
81789