Sir Nicholas Shireburne, Bar. is plaintiff. And Robert Hitch, Esq; defendant. In a writ of error to reverse a judgment given for the defendant in the Queen's-Bench, ... The defendant's case

You might also be interested in

• Image not available

  In Supreme Court of the United States : The Richmond Mining Company of Nevada, Plaintiff in Error. vs. The Eureka Consolidated Mining Company, Defendant in Error. No Writ of Error

  Rare Books

  55642

• Image not available

  An Act for limiting certain times within which writs of error shall be brought for the reversing fines, common recoveries and ancient judgments

  Rare Books

  20484:14

• Image not available

  The report of the Lords committees appointed to draw up the state of the case upon the writ of error, ... wherein Matthew Ashby was plaintiff, and William White and others defendants

  Rare Books

  341487

• Image not available

  An argument of a learned judge in the Exchequer-Chamber upon a writ of error out of the King's-Bench, in a cause, wherein Sir Samuel Barnadiston was plaintiff against Sir William Soame

  Rare Books

  56365

• Image not available

  The report of the Lords committees appointed to draw up the state of the case upon the writ of error, lately depending in the House of Peers; wherein Matthew Ashby was plaintiff, and William White and others defendants

  Rare Books

  21331

• Image not available

  A defence of the late Lord Russel's innocency, : by way of answer or confutation of a libellous pamphlet, intituled, An antidote against poyson; with two letters of the author of this book, upon the subject of his Lordship's tryal. Together with an argument in the great case concerning elections of Members to Parliament, between Sr Samuel Barnardiston bar. plaintiff, and Sr Will. Soames sheriff of Suffolk, defend' in the Court of Kings-Bench, in an action upon the case, and afterwards by error sued in the Exchequer-Chamber

  Rare Books

  301510