The case of labourers in husbandry stated and considered, : in three parts. Part I. A view of their distressed condition. Part II. The principal causes of their growing distress and number, ... Part III. Means of relief proposed. ... By David Davies

You might also be interested in

• Image not available

  Remarks upon that part of the great Bedford Level, called the North Level, in which the causes of its first drowning, and of its present ruinous condition, are considered : with some proposals for the better draining of said level

  Rare Books

  487207

• Image not available

  Several discourses concerning the terms of acceptance with God. : In which I. The terms themselves are distinctly laid down; as they are proposed to Christians in the New Testament. And II. Several false notions of the conditions of salvation are considered. Particularly of being saved by faith. Of trusting to external performances. Of the power of charity to cover sins. Of relying upon the merits of Christ. Of man's weakness, and God's grace. Of repentance. Of the example of the thief on the cross. Of trusting to a death-bed sorrow. Of the parable of the labourers i the vineyard. Of depending upon amendment in time to come

  Rare Books

  80759

• Image not available

  "Expropriation of Land in Lower California." File 089-4, Part 1. From (~1.5"). Includes some U.S. govt. docs, such as an item on the American Mexican Claims Commission, dated 1943 ("Established pursuant to the Settlement of Mexican Claims Act of 1942.") Talk about an irresistable force meeting an immovable object: the SP, king of the land-grabbing railroads, versus the Carranza/Cardenas/Camacho land-redistributing agrarian machine! In this body of material, the SPM is trying to reclaim lands they considered theirs by some earlier precedents and agreements, most of which predate the 1917 Constitution. But it's clear from this that even the U.S. govt., in the form of the Agrarian Claims Commission, doesn't think the SP has any claim to certain contested lands in Mexico. On Oct. 8, 1940, ACC Executive Officer George H. Winters politely but firmly responds in a three-page letter to SP VP W.A. Worthington that "It is not clear how the agreements of Dec. 28, 1915 and June 22, 1916 [which he details at the start of letter] can, of themselves, properly be regarded as establishing any interest on the part of the Southern Pacific Company in the lands in question." He goes on to note that "From the language of the first of those arguments it seems to be obvious that the creation of any interest in the lands here involved on the part of the claimant depended upon the performance of a number of conditions subsequent. The record contains no direct evidence as to the performance of those conditions...," etc. This letter is quite revealing of U.S. policy with regard to American land claims. The FDR government's Good Neighborhood-ism colors a lot of this, in fascinating ways. This also involves the SP-sheltered venture known as the "Compa-ia de Terrenos Y Aguas de La Baja California," which is noted elsewhere in this survey (specifically, see II:4, XIII:1, XIII:4). Also contains large envelope with maps, other materials; didn't look inside envelope

  Manuscripts

  These materials, consisting primarily of correspondence but also including maps, news clippings, photographs, and blueprints, are arranged and bound by topic according to the Southern Pacific's internal organizational schema. There are 160 individual bound items in these 23 boxes. Each grouping is in reverse chronological order as it was originally filed by SP de México administrators. Collection has material in English and Spanish.

  mssSPdeMéxicocollection